What do the following have in common:
- Bring your own device
- Personal leaning networks
- Games based learning
- Project based learning
- Constructivist theory
- 1 to 1 learning
- Differenited curriculum
- Personalised learning
- Social learning
- Virtual world learning
- Flipped classroom
I contend that the common theme in all these learning philosophies is ‘the learner owning their learning’. How much control do the learners at a conference have on their learning experience? How are presenters possibly able to allow participants to own the learning. Rather we see an endless list of populist comments and assumptions about every teacher having archaic classrooms, content laden pedagogies and teacher centric instruction. Now isn’t that ironic?
I have no doubt that a traditional conference format has value but…
- A tradional conference can inspire, but… we need the ability to turn that inspiration to action
- A tradional conference can create cognitive dissonance, but… unless we can close the gap it’s just creating learned helplessness
- A tradional conference can connect, but… usually this favours the already connected further issolating those with lesser connections
What we need is the ‘how to’ turn inspiration, cognitive dissonance and connections into meaningful change in our classrooms, faculties or schools. How can a traditional conference provide the necessary networks, support, structures and resources to turn a Unicorn into reality, for every participant?
At the 1 to 1 Learning Unconference before we designed anything we only made two assumptions: everyone is a learner and everyone is a leader. We then surveyed participants to find out what they wanted to learn, how they learned best and what skills/knowledge/understanding they had to support others learning. From this data we designed the learning spaces and experiences. The focus was on connecting teachers, exploring ideas, learning new skills and creating action plans that participants could turn into relality.
I leave the participant survey to speak for itself:

I hope one day the default conference experience is bring your own Unicorn. Teachers solution dream what change they want to see, based on their context, do some basic planning and research before the conference. Then attend the conference with the explicit aim to collaborate with their peers to turn their Unicorn into reality.
I expect many will refute my thinking, it’s only human nature to reject inconsistent ideas, but I’m OK with that…